Results for 'Cancer drug efficacy'
Emmanuelle Jacqueta, Ghania Kerouani-Lafayeb, Francoise Grudeb, Sergio Goncalvesb, Annie Lorenced, Florence Turcryb, Liora Brunelb, Laetitia Belgodereb, Adrien Monardc, Gaëlle Guyaderb, Lotfi Boudalib, Nicolas Albin
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years
Innovation, Expanded access, Early drug access, Cancer, FDA, EMA
Cancer incidence is increasing globally, and while medical innovation significantly impacts patient survival, the drug development process is lengthy, often exceeding 10 years for marketing authorization (MA). France has implemented the ATU (Temporary Authorization for Use) program to facil…
Apr 7th • 12 mins read
Thakur, Sayanta & Lahiry, Sandeep
Accelerated drug approvals in oncology: Pros and cons
Clinical study, drug approval, medical oncology
The summary of the content highlights the success of the accelerated approval process, especially for oncology drugs. Key points include: The rise of accelerated approval processes is significant, particularly in oncology. The use of surrogate endpoints and their validation has been debated. Th…
Sep 14th • 4 mins read
Sonoko Kawakatsu, René Bruno, Matts Kågedal, Chunze Li, Sandhya Girish, Amita Joshi, Benjamin Wu
Confounding factors in exposure–response analyses and mitigation strategies for monoclonal antibodies in oncology
monoclonal antibodies, E-R analyses, tumour growth inhibition, drug development
Dose selection and optimization is crucial in drug development to maximize benefits for all patients. Exposure–response (E-R) analysis is useful for dose-selection strategy, but in oncology, prognostic factors can confound the analysis, especially for monoclonal antibodies. The review addr…
Nov 20th • 12 mins read
Consolación Molto MD, Thomas J. Hwang AB, Maria Borrell MD, Marta Andres MD, Ignasi Gich MD, PhD, Agustí Barnadas MD, PhD, Eitan Amir MD, PhD, Aaron S. Kesselheim MD, JD, MPH, Ariadna Tibau MD, PhD
Clinical benefit and cost of breakthrough cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
USFDA, ESMO-MCBS, NCCN, ASCO-CRC, clinical, drug aroval
The study evaluates the clinical benefit and pricing of breakthrough-designated versus non-breakthrough-designated cancer drugs. The analysis covers approvals from July 2012 to December 2017, using frameworks like ASCO-VF, ASCO-CRC, ESMO-MCBS, and NCCN Evidence Blocks. High clinical benef…
Jul 22nd • 12 mins read
Cornelius F Waller & Adriano Friganovi´c
Biosimilars in oncology: key role of nurses in patient education
biologics, biosimilars, cancer care, nurse
Biosimilars can reduce costs and improve access to cancer therapies, but unfamiliarity may hinder their adoption. Nurses, as trusted healthcare providers, are crucial in educating patients about biosimilars. Biosimilars are highly regulated and offer benefits comparable to existing biologic…
Jun 15th • 10 mins read
Nicole Grossmann, Martin Robausch, Eleen Rothschedl, Claudia Wild, Judit Simon
Publicly accessible evidence of health-related quality of life benefits associated with cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2009 and 2015
Antineoplastic agents, Health-related quality of life, Clinical efficacy, Drug approvals, Patient-relevant outcomes
The study investigates cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that initially lack Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) information. Data was collected for cancer indications approved between January 2009 and October 2015, using sources like the EMA website, clinical…
Feb 23rd • 12 mins read
Roman Adam, Ariadna Tibau, Consolación Molto Valiente, Boštjan Šeruga, Alberto Ocaña, Eitan Amir, Arnoud J. Templeton
Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland 2010–2019
cancer drug approval, clinical benefit criteria, ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, OLUtool, Switzerland oncology drugs
The study evaluates the clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved in Switzerland between 2010 and 2019 using three different frameworks: ESMO-MCBS, ASCO-VF, and OLUtool. A total of 48 drugs for 92 indications were assessed based on 100 studies, with each study evaluated according to the criteria …
Jun 10th • 35 mins read
Christopher A. Busch, MSC; Johannes Krisam, PhD; Meinhard Kieser, PhD
A Comprehensive Comparison of Additional Benefit Assessment Methods Applied by Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care and European Society for Medical Oncology for Time-to-Event Endpoints After Significant Phase III Trials—A Simulation Study
cancer drug trials, time-to-event endpoints, overall survival, added benefit assessment, IQWiG, hazard ratio thresholds
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) use different methods for assessing additional benefit in cancer therapies, with ESMO considering both relative and absolute benefits, while IQWiG focuses on the upper limit …
Jun 28th • 30 mins read
Natansh D. Modi, BPharm; Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa, PhD; Ross A. McKinnon, PhD
Audit of Data Sharing by Pharmaceutical Companies for Anticancer Medicines Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
IPD sharing, clinical trial transparency, FDA anticancer approvals, oncology trials, data accessibility, pharmaceutical industry
The study examines the eligibility for individual participant data (IPD) sharing from clinical trials that supported the FDA approval of anticancer medicines over the past 10 years. Of the 304 trials analyzed, 136 (45%) were eligible for IPD sharing, while 168 (55%) were not. IPD sharing rates v…
Jul 28th • 20 mins read
Miloš D. Miljković, MD, MSc, Jordan E. Tuia, BA, Timothée Olivier, MD
Association Between US Drug Price and Measures of Efficacy for Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2015 to 2020
Cancer drug pricing, Cancer care costs, Cancer drug efficacy, Progression-free survival, Value-based pricing in oncology, FDA anticancer approvals
The US has worse cancer-related outcomes compared to other high-income countries and has the highest cost of cancer care globally. High costs may be attributed to the improved efficacy of expensive new cancer drugs, though the relationship between cost and benefit is debated. A study found a lin…
Oct 31st • 10 mins read
John Hair, Thomas Maryon, and Cristian Lieneck
Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption
oncology, cancer, biosimilar, barriers, access, obstacles
Biosimilars are biologic medical products that are almost identical to original biologics but are produced by different companies. They are safe, effective, and can reduce costs for insurers and patients. Despite the benefits, barriers exist for oncologists and cancer centers in prescribing biosi…
Oct 27th • 30 mins read
Ravi B. Parikh, MD, MPP Rebecca A. Hubbard, PhD Erkuan Wang, MA Trevor J. Royce, MD, MPH Aaron B. Cohen, MD, MSCE Amy S. Clark, MD, MSCE Ronac Mamtani, MD, MSCE
Exposure to US Cancer Drugs With Lack of Confirmed Benefit After US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval
US, FDA, approval, drugs, benefits, cancer
Among 5 oncology indications, 26.1% of eligible treatment initiations involved an Accelerated Approval (AA) indication that was later withdrawn due to lack of benefit. There is an inherent trade-off between expediting access to promising cancer drugs and the potential withdrawal of some indicatio…
Dec 8th • 2 mins read
Yafang Huanga, Weiyi Xiongb, Jingwei Zhaoa, Wentao Lia, Li Mac, Hao Wua
Early phase clinical trial played a critical role in the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications for targeted anticancer drugs: a cross-sectional study from 2012 to 2021
Early phase clinical trial, Dose-expansion cohort, Single-arm trial, Pivotal trial, FDA approved indications, Targeted anticancer drugs
Analysis of 188 FDA-approved indications for 95 molecular targeted anticancer drugs between 2012 and 2021. 59.6% of indications were approved based on Early Phase Clinical Trials (EPCTs). There was a notable annual increase of 22.2% in approvals based on EPCTs, compared to a 5.0% increase for ph…
Mar 9th • 10 mins read
Kyle A. Dymanus BS, Mohit Butaney MBBS, Diana E. Magee MD, MPH, MSc, Amanda E. Hird MD, MSc, Amy N. Luckenbaugh MD, Merry W. Ma MD, PhD, Mary E. Hall MD, Heather L. Huelster MD, Aaron A. Laviana MD, MBA, Nancy B. Davis MD, Martha K. Terris MD, Zachary Kla
Assessment of gender representation in clinical trials leading to FDA approval for oncology therapeutics between 2014 and 2019: A systematic review-based cohort study
clinical trials, drug approval, health care disparities, medical oncology, sexism
Gender representation in oncology clinical trials varies by cancer type, with women often underrepresented compared to national cancer incidence. Despite FDA guidelines from June 2015 requiring consideration of biological variables like sex in research designs, disparities persist. Women continu…
Jun 23rd • 8 mins read
MAXIMILIAN SALCHER-KONRAD, HUSEYIN NACI, COURTNEY DAVIS
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States
pharmaceutical regulation, US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, cancer.
Regulatory agencies often have limited evidence on the clinical benefits and harms of new drugs at the time of market approval. There is frequent discordance between the FDA and EMA in regulatory outcomes and the use of special regulatory pathways for cancer drugs of uncertain therapeutic value. …
Oct 6th • 48 mins read
Mohamed Elmeliegy PhD, Derek Z. Yang BS, Engie Salama PharmD, Kourosh Parivar MPharm, Diane D. Wang PhD
Discordance Between Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Classifications for Hepatic Dysfunction: Implications on Dosing Recommendations for Oncology Compounds
FDA, hepatic dysfunction, child-pugh, national cancer institute, dosing, oncology compounds
The FDA and European Medicines Agency recommend using Child-Pugh classification for pharmacokinetic evaluation in noncancer subjects with hepatic impairment (HI). Dosing recommendations for oncology compounds for patients with HI are commonly based on Child-Pugh classification. In oncology …
Jul 20th • 18 mins read
Emerson Y. Chen, MD, Vikram Raghunathan, MD, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH
An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate
FDA, RR, drug approvels, OS
Many cancer drugs come to market based on single-arm studies with modest RRs. Most of these drugs are tested in studies of over 100 patients prior to approval. Most (60%) of these approvals lack randomized clinical trials during the life cycle of the product. Our findings suggest greater room for th…
May 28th • 5 mins read
Emerson Y. Chen, MD, Sunil K. Joshi, BA, Audrey Tran, BA
Estimation of Study Time Reduction Using Surrogate End Points Rather Than Overall Survival in Oncology Clinical Trials
bevacizumab, metastatic breast cancer, RR, PFS, FDA, oncology clinical trials
The use of Response Rate (RR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS) in clinical trials leading to FDA approval is associated with different study durations: RR: Median study duration of 25 months (range, 11-54 months). PFS: Median study duration of 31 months (range, 10-…
Apr 1st • 10 mins read
Ariadna Tibau, Consolación Molto, Alberto Ocana, Arnoud J Templeton, Luis P Del Carpio, Joseph C Del Paggio, Agustí Barnadas, Christopher M Booth, Eitan Amir
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
antineoplastic agents, immunologic adjuvants, pharmaceutical adjuvants, phase 3 clinical trials, drug approval, drug labeling, medical oncology, united states food and drug administration, diagnosis, palliative care, surrogate endpoints, weight measureme
Regulatory agencies assess drug safety and efficacy, but thresholds may differ from those accepted by clinicians . Only 43.8% of RCTs for FDA-approved drugs meet the ESMO-MCBS threshold for meaningful benefit, reflecting potential softening of FDA standards. Encouraging trends include an increas…
Dec 13th • 7 mins read
iNIZIO
Transforming oncology: Five frontiers driving progress in cancer care
From biomarker-driven breakthroughs to AI-powered early detection and a renewed commitment to equity and patient centricity, the past 12 months have seen major strides across cancer research, treatment, and communication. At Inizio, we’ve had a front-row seat to this transformation, supporting…
May 16th • 5 mins read