Results for 'accelerated approval cancer drugs'
Avi Cherla, MSc; Huseyin Naci, MHS, PhD; Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH; Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD; Elias Mossialos, MD, PhD
Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval
FDA, NHS, accelerated approval, NICE, clinical trial findings
The study evaluates the acceptance and coverage of FDA-accelerated approved cancer drugs by the National Health Service (NHS) in England, focusing on decisions made by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). A total of 93 cancer drug indications received accelerated approval…
Feb 22nd • 10 mins read
Thakur, Sayanta & Lahiry, Sandeep
Accelerated drug approvals in oncology: Pros and cons
Clinical study, drug approval, medical oncology
The summary of the content highlights the success of the accelerated approval process, especially for oncology drugs. Key points include: The rise of accelerated approval processes is significant, particularly in oncology. The use of surrogate endpoints and their validation has been debated. Th…
Sep 14th • 4 mins read
Rachel E. Sachs, JD, MPH, Kyle A. Gavulic, BA, Julie M. Donohue, PhD
Recent Trends in Medicaid Spending and Use of Drugs With US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval
FDA accelerated approval, Medicaid spending, prescription drug costs, surrogate endpoints, cancer drugs, drug approval pathway
The study examines the impact of drugs approved through the FDA’s accelerated approval program on state Medicaid spending. From 1992 to 2020, 216 drug-indication pairs were granted accelerated approval, with a significant increase in cancer drug approvals in recent years. Although drugs wi…
Oct 8th • 25 mins read
Ravi B. Parikh, MD, MPP Rebecca A. Hubbard, PhD Erkuan Wang, MA Trevor J. Royce, MD, MPH Aaron B. Cohen, MD, MSCE Amy S. Clark, MD, MSCE Ronac Mamtani, MD, MSCE
Exposure to US Cancer Drugs With Lack of Confirmed Benefit After US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval
US, FDA, approval, drugs, benefits, cancer
Among 5 oncology indications, 26.1% of eligible treatment initiations involved an Accelerated Approval (AA) indication that was later withdrawn due to lack of benefit. There is an inherent trade-off between expediting access to promising cancer drugs and the potential withdrawal of some indicatio…
Dec 8th • 2 mins read
Bishal Gyawali, Benjamin N Rome, Aaron S Kesselheim
Report from American Society of Clinical Oncology Symposium 2020 and American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium 2021
ASCO, TNT, Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium
Six out of 18 cancer drugs with accelerated approval still have indications on labeling and are recommended in guidelines despite not showing improvement in primary endpoints in post-approval trials. This issue highlights the imbalance between speed and evidence in the accelerated approval pathwa…
Aug 4th • 13 mins read
Bishal Gyawali, Benjamin N Rome, Aaron S Kesselheim
Regulatory and clinical consequences of negative confirmatory trials of accelerated approval cancer drugs: retrospective observational study
clinical guidelines, FDA, accelerated approval cancer drugs, surrogate measures, NCCN, EMA
Six of 18 cancer drugs that initially received accelerated approval have indications that remain on the labeling and are recommended in clinical guidelines despite no improvement in the primary endpoint in post-approval trials. These findings reflect the lack of fulfillment of the compromise between…
Aug 4th • 12 mins read
Di Maria Jiang, Kelvin K. W. Chan, Raymond W. Jang, Christopher Booth, Geoffrey Liu, Eitan Amir, Robert Mason, Louis Everest, Elena Elimova
Anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for gastrointestinal malignancies: Clinical benefit and price considerations
ASCO VF, ESMO MCBS, gastrointestinal malignancies, anticancer drugs
Drugs approved between 2006 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical benefit was measured using ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale and ASCO Value Framework. 16 GI cancer drugs received FDA approval for 24 indications, including various drug classes such as monoclonal antibodies, oral targeted …
Mar 7th • 8 mins read
Kirsten B Goldberg, Gideon M Blumenthal, Amy E McKee and Richard Pazdur
The FDA Oncology Center of Excellence and Precision Medicine
Biomarkers, drugs, hematology, medicine, oncology, precision medicine, regulation
The FDA is exploring real-world evidence to enhance understanding of the long-term safety and efficacy of oncology drugs. Initiatives like the Information Exchange and Data Transformation initiative are building infrastructure for big-data analytics. Additionally, patient-focused programs aim to inc…
Nov 6th • 3 mins read
Ariadna Tibau, Consolación Molto, Alberto Ocana, Arnoud J Templeton, Luis P Del Carpio, Joseph C Del Paggio, Agustí Barnadas, Christopher M Booth, Eitan Amir
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
antineoplastic agents, immunologic adjuvants, pharmaceutical adjuvants, phase 3 clinical trials, drug approval, drug labeling, medical oncology, united states food and drug administration, diagnosis, palliative care, surrogate endpoints, weight measureme
Regulatory agencies assess drug safety and efficacy, but thresholds may differ from those accepted by clinicians . Only 43.8% of RCTs for FDA-approved drugs meet the ESMO-MCBS threshold for meaningful benefit, reflecting potential softening of FDA standards. Encouraging trends include an increas…
Dec 13th • 7 mins read
Mahnum Shahzad, BA, Huseyin Naci, MHS, PhD, Anita K. Wagner, PharmD, MPH, DrPH
Estimated Medicare Spending on Cancer Drug Indications With a Confirmed Lack of Clinical Benefit After US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated
medicare spending, drug indications, AA, FDA, medicare, ODAC
Medicare Parts B and D spent at least $569 million between 2017 and 2019 on 10 cancer drug indications without confirmed overall survival (OS) benefit after accelerated approval (AA). Approximately $224 million was spent on drug indications that were either voluntarily withdrawn or recommended fo…
Oct 18th • 5 mins read
Cheryl Ho, MD, Howard J. Lim, MD, Dean A. Regier, PhD
Canadian Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment for Malignant Hematology and Oncology Indications Compared With the US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval Program
canada, oncology, malignant, hematology, HTC
Canadian regulatory approvals align with FDA decisions, but submission numbers to Health Canada (HC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes are lower in Canada. There is a nearly 3-year delay between Accelerated Approval (AA) and funded access to treatment for Canadians. HTA in Canada …
Jun 5th • 6 mins read
Emerson Y. Chen, MD, Vikram Raghunathan, MD, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH
An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate
FDA, RR, drug approvels, OS
Many cancer drugs come to market based on single-arm studies with modest RRs. Most of these drugs are tested in studies of over 100 patients prior to approval. Most (60%) of these approvals lack randomized clinical trials during the life cycle of the product. Our findings suggest greater room for th…
May 28th • 5 mins read
Diana Brixner, PhD, RPh [email protected], Joseph Biskupiak, PhD, MBA, Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Douglas Burgoyne, PharmD, FAMCP, Daniel C Malone, RPh, PhD, FAMCP, Bhakti Arondekar, PhD, MBA, and Alexander Niyazov, PharmD, RPh, MPH
Payer perceptions of the use of real-world evidence in oncology-based decision making
real world evidence, RWE, RCT, randomized controlled trials, payer, perceptions, FDA
US payers find real-world evidence (RWE) useful for improving costs and outcomes in oncology, and for making formulary decisions. Payers prioritize comparative effectiveness evidence but also value other RWE types such as total cost of care, burden of illness, treatment patterns, and economic…
Aug 1st • 12 mins read