Join to access to all OVN content. Join for Free

Results for 'oncology drug costs'

Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis
OVN Avatar Jayson L. Parker, Sebnem S. Kuzulugil, Kirill Pereverzev, Stephen Mac, Gilberto Lopes, Zain Shah, Ashini Weerasinghe, Daniel Rubinger, Adam Falconi, Ayse Bener, Bora Caglayan, Rohan Tangri, Nicholas Mitsakakis
Does biomarker use in oncology improve clinical trial failure risk? A large-scale analysis

biomarker, clinical trial, failure, analysis, NSCLC, oncology

Data from clinical trials across four oncology indications (breast cancer, NSCLC, melanoma, and colorectal cancer) from 1998 to 2017 were analyzed to assess drug approval likelihood based on biomarker status. Using multi-state Markov models, which describe stochastic processes, the study…

Feb 23rd • 8 mins read

Cost per Event Averted in Cancer Trials in the Adjuvant Setting From 2018 to 2022
OVN Avatar Idine Mousavi, BA; Timothée Olivier, MD; Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH
Cost per Event Averted in Cancer Trials in the Adjuvant Setting From 2018 to 2022

anticancer drugs, adjuvant therapy, FDA approvals, cost per event averted, surrogate endpoints, oncology drug costs

Importance: Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapies based on the cost per event averted. Objective: To assess the costs per event averted for anticancer drugs approved by the FDA between January 2018 and March 2022. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of F…

Jun 10th • 30 mins read

Association Between US Drug Price and Measures of Efficacy for Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2015 to 2020
OVN Avatar Miloš D. Miljković, MD, MSc, Jordan E. Tuia, BA, Timothée Olivier, MD
Association Between US Drug Price and Measures of Efficacy for Oncology Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2015 to 2020

Cancer drug pricing, Cancer care costs, Cancer drug efficacy, Progression-free survival, Value-based pricing in oncology, FDA anticancer approvals

The US has worse cancer-related outcomes compared to other high-income countries and has the highest cost of cancer care globally. High costs may be attributed to the improved efficacy of expensive new cancer drugs, though the relationship between cost and benefit is debated. A study found a lin…

Oct 31st • 10 mins read

Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption
OVN Avatar John Hair, Thomas Maryon, and Cristian Lieneck
Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption

oncology, cancer, biosimilar, barriers, access, obstacles

Biosimilars are biologic medical products that are almost identical to original biologics but are produced by different companies. They are safe, effective, and can reduce costs for insurers and patients. Despite the benefits, barriers exist for oncologists and cancer centers in prescribing biosi…

Oct 27th • 30 mins read

Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale
OVN Avatar S.F. Oosting, J. Barriuso, A. Bottomley, M. Galotti, B. Gyawali, B. Kiesewetter, N.J. Latino, F. Martinelli, M. Pe, G. Pentheroudakis, F. Roitberg, H. Vachon, E.G.E. de Vries, M. Piccart, N.I. Cherny
Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale

Benefit Scale, MCBS, Quality of Life, Health Assessment, Oncology Scale, Cancer Guidelines, Treatment Evaluation, Medicine Scoring

The ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) was introduced in 2015 to standardize the assessment of clinical benefits from cancer treatments. ESMO-MCBS helps in health-technology assessment, especially given the increasing number of treatment options and rising cancer care costs. Ne…

Apr 1st • 30 mins read

Value assessment of oncology drugs using a weighted criterion-based approach
OVN Avatar Doreen A. Ezeife MD, Francois Dionne PhD, Aline Fusco Fares MD, Ellen Laura Rose Cusano MD, Rouhi Fazelzad BSc, MISt, Wenzie Ng BSc, MPharm, RPh, Don Husereau BSc Pharm, MSc, Farzad Ali BPharm, MSc, Christina Sit MSc, Barry Stein B.Com BCL, LLB, Jennifer
Value assessment of oncology drugs using a weighted criterion-based approach

anticancer therapy, multicriteria decision analysis, value assessment, value assessment framework

The rising cost of anticancer therapy has led to efforts to quantify the overall value of new cancer treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis is used to incorporate multiple criteria and perspectives into value assessment. A diverse, multistakeholder group developed a drug assessment framewor…

Dec 20th • 15 mins read

Oncology biosimilars: New developments and future directions
OVN Avatar Rinda Devi Bachu, Mariam Abou-Dahech, Swapnaa Balaji, Sai H. S. Boddu, Samson Amos, Vishal Singh, R. Jayachandra Babu, Amit K. Tiwari
Oncology biosimilars: New developments and future directions

biologics in cancer treatment, biosimilars development, high cost of biologics, healthcare system burden, biosimilars safety, regulatory guidelines for biosimilars, immunogenicity concerns, pharmacoeconomics of biosimilars

Biologics are essential in cancer treatment as both therapeutic and supportive care agents, but they are expensive and require extensive testing to ensure safety. The high cost of developing and manufacturing biologics can be a burden on healthcare systems, limiting patient access to necessary tr…

Nov 25th • 30 mins read

Evaluating External Validity of Oncology Biosimilar Safety Studies
OVN Avatar Gregory S. Calip, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Ivy P. Altomare, MD, Jenny S. Guadamuz, MSPH, PhD
Evaluating External Validity of Oncology Biosimilar Safety Studies

biologics, external validity, FDA, biosimilars, trastuzumab

Biologics are the fastest growing medication class in the US, significantly contributing to healthcare costs. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 created an abbreviated approval pathway to make biological products more accessible. A phase 3 randomized trial of SB3, a trast…

Apr 6th • 2 mins read

Opportunities and challenges in biosimilar uptake in oncology
OVN Avatar Carina Dolan, PharmD, BCOP
Opportunities and challenges in biosimilar uptake in oncology

Trastuzumab, Rituximab, biosimiliar agents, emerging agents, cetuximab, bevacizumab, clinical trials, biosimiliars

The U.S. has 10 approved biosimilars, including 3 for oncology, with many more in development, potentially increasing access to expensive biologics. Acceptance by healthcare providers and patients requires extensive education, resolving concerns about immunogenicity, and ensuring interchangeability.…

Jun 26th • 7 mins read

Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale
OVN Avatar Louis Everest, BSc; Monica Shah, BSc; Kelvin K.W. Chan, MD, MSc, PhD
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale

immunotherapy-triggered LTP, RCTs, FDA, ICI

Importance: Anticancer agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have shown potential for long-term durable survival in some patients. However, traditional clinical benefit measures may not accurately capture this, leading to proposed amendments in valuation frameworks. Objectives: …

Jul 10th • 12 mins read

Medical Oncologists’ Knowledge and Perspectives on the Use of Biosimilars in the United States
OVN Avatar John Devin Peipert, PhD, Karen Kaiser, PhD, Sheetal Kircher, MD, George J. Greene, PhD, Sara Shaunfield, PhD, Katherina Hauner, PhD, David Cella, PhD, and Daniel K. Mroczek, PhD
Medical Oncologists’ Knowledge and Perspectives on the Use of Biosimilars in the United States

oncologist, biosimilars, ASCO, FDA, RSP

Most oncologists (88%) treated patients with biosimilars, and 63% reported that biosimilars were required at their institutions. Approximately half (52%) correctly identified that biosimilars are not the same as generic medicines. Common barriers to biosimilar use included concerns abou…

Jan 9th • 9 mins read

Related Topics

Loading...