Results for 'Health Assessment'
Nicole Grossmann, Martin Robausch, Eleen Rothschedl, Claudia Wild, Judit Simon
Publicly accessible evidence of health-related quality of life benefits associated with cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2009 and 2015
Antineoplastic agents, Health-related quality of life, Clinical efficacy, Drug approvals, Patient-relevant outcomes
The study investigates cancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that initially lack Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) information. Data was collected for cancer indications approved between January 2009 and October 2015, using sources like the EMA website, clinical…
Feb 23rd • 12 mins read
Doreen A. Ezeife MD, Francois Dionne PhD, Aline Fusco Fares MD, Ellen Laura Rose Cusano MD, Rouhi Fazelzad BSc, MISt, Wenzie Ng BSc, MPharm, RPh, Don Husereau BSc Pharm, MSc, Farzad Ali BPharm, MSc, Christina Sit MSc, Barry Stein B.Com BCL, LLB, Jennifer
Value assessment of oncology drugs using a weighted criterion-based approach
anticancer therapy, multicriteria decision analysis, value assessment, value assessment framework
The rising cost of anticancer therapy has led to efforts to quantify the overall value of new cancer treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis is used to incorporate multiple criteria and perspectives into value assessment. A diverse, multistakeholder group developed a drug assessment framewor…
Dec 20th • 15 mins read
Mariam A. Ahmed, Chirag Patel, Nicole Drezner, Whitney Helms, Weiwei Tan, Daria Stypinski
Pivotal Considerations for Optimal Deployment of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development
drug development, healthy, volunteers, oncology clinical trial
The content discusses the challenges and opportunities in conducting oncology clinical trials, particularly focusing on trials involving normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) and patients with cancer. There are over 5,000 ongoing oncology trials in the U.S., with low enrollment rates among adult c…
Oct 31st • 20 mins read
Christopher A. Busch, MSC; Johannes Krisam, PhD; Meinhard Kieser, PhD
A Comprehensive Comparison of Additional Benefit Assessment Methods Applied by Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care and European Society for Medical Oncology for Time-to-Event Endpoints After Significant Phase III Trials—A Simulation Study
cancer drug trials, time-to-event endpoints, overall survival, added benefit assessment, IQWiG, hazard ratio thresholds
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) use different methods for assessing additional benefit in cancer therapies, with ESMO considering both relative and absolute benefits, while IQWiG focuses on the upper limit …
Jun 28th • 30 mins read
S.F. Oosting, J. Barriuso, A. Bottomley, M. Galotti, B. Gyawali, B. Kiesewetter, N.J. Latino, F. Martinelli, M. Pe, G. Pentheroudakis, F. Roitberg, H. Vachon, E.G.E. de Vries, M. Piccart, N.I. Cherny
Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale
Benefit Scale, MCBS, Quality of Life, Health Assessment, Oncology Scale, Cancer Guidelines, Treatment Evaluation, Medicine Scoring
The ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) was introduced in 2015 to standardize the assessment of clinical benefits from cancer treatments. ESMO-MCBS helps in health-technology assessment, especially given the increasing number of treatment options and rising cancer care costs. Ne…
Apr 1st • 30 mins read
Kyle A. Dymanus BS, Mohit Butaney MBBS, Diana E. Magee MD, MPH, MSc, Amanda E. Hird MD, MSc, Amy N. Luckenbaugh MD, Merry W. Ma MD, PhD, Mary E. Hall MD, Heather L. Huelster MD, Aaron A. Laviana MD, MBA, Nancy B. Davis MD, Martha K. Terris MD, Zachary Kla
Assessment of gender representation in clinical trials leading to FDA approval for oncology therapeutics between 2014 and 2019: A systematic review-based cohort study
clinical trials, drug approval, health care disparities, medical oncology, sexism
Gender representation in oncology clinical trials varies by cancer type, with women often underrepresented compared to national cancer incidence. Despite FDA guidelines from June 2015 requiring consideration of biological variables like sex in research designs, disparities persist. Women continu…
Jun 23rd • 8 mins read
Jing Luo, Shunlong Ou, Hua Wei, Xiaoli Qin, Rui Peng, Song Wang and Qian Jiang
Value assessment of NMPA-approved new cancer drugs for solid cancer in China, 2016-2020
cancer drugs, clinical benefit, cost, ASCO-VF, ESMO-MCBS
This study is the first in China to comprehensively evaluate the value of new cancer drugs using ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS frameworks and investigate the correlation between drug prices and clinical benefits. Approximately half of the new cancer drugs approved by NMPA between 2016 and 2020 achie…
Feb 24th • 8 mins read
Gracy Crane, John C. W. Lim, Churn-Shiouh Gau, Jipan Xie & Laura Chu
The challenges and opportunities in using real-world data to drive advances in healthcare in East Asia: expert panel recommendations
Real-world data, real-world evidenc, East Asia, policy recommendations, decision-making support, East Asia, expert, RWD, RWE
Recommend approaches to improve the use of Real-World Evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making in East Asia and beyond. Encourage large-scale collaborations involving diverse stakeholders. Key stakeholders include government agencies, hospitals, research organizations, patient groups, and th…
Jun 28th • 13 mins read
Cheryl Ho, MD, Howard J. Lim, MD, Dean A. Regier, PhD
Canadian Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment for Malignant Hematology and Oncology Indications Compared With the US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval Program
canada, oncology, malignant, hematology, HTC
Canadian regulatory approvals align with FDA decisions, but submission numbers to Health Canada (HC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) processes are lower in Canada. There is a nearly 3-year delay between Accelerated Approval (AA) and funded access to treatment for Canadians. HTA in Canada …
Jun 5th • 6 mins read
M. Bertagnolli and J. Tabernero
Value assessment frameworks in oncology: championing concordance through shared standards
The ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score (ASCO-NHB) and the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS), introduced in 2015, are essential tools for assessing the relative benefit of cancer therapies. Both ASCO and ESMO continually refine these frameworks and engage with stakeholde…
Feb 18th • 1 min read
iNIZIO
Clinical Educator Oncology Program Improves Adherence by 29%
CASE STUDY (US) The Challenge Client’s specialty product had a complicated oral therapy regimen requiring supplemental support to patients. Therapy administered for chronic life-threatening condition in which patients are generally older and polypharmic. Our Soluti…
Sep 3rd • 1 min read
B. Gyawali, E. G. E. de Vries, U. Dafni, T. Amaral, J. Barriuso, J. Bogaerts, A. Calles, G. Curigliano, C. Gomez-Roca, B. Kiesewetter, S. Oosting, A. Passaro, G. Pentheroudakis, M. Piccart, F. Roitberg, J. Tabernero, N. Tarazona, D. Trapani, R. Wester, G.
Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring
ESMO-MCBS, bias, clinical trial design, clinical trial implementation, clinical trial reporting, clinical trial analysis
The ESMO-MCBS is a tool used for scoring the clinical benefit of cancer medicines as reported in clinical trials, assuming valid research methodologies and quality implementation. The tool's effectiveness is compromised by studies with flawed design, implementation, or data analysis, w…
Apr 20th • 8 mins read
Emmanuelle Jacqueta, Ghania Kerouani-Lafayeb, Francoise Grudeb, Sergio Goncalvesb, Annie Lorenced, Florence Turcryb, Liora Brunelb, Laetitia Belgodereb, Adrien Monardc, Gaëlle Guyaderb, Lotfi Boudalib, Nicolas Albin
Comparative study on anticancer drug access times between FDA, EMA and the French temporary authorisation for use program over 13 years
Innovation, Expanded access, Early drug access, Cancer, FDA, EMA
Cancer incidence is increasing globally, and while medical innovation significantly impacts patient survival, the drug development process is lengthy, often exceeding 10 years for marketing authorization (MA). France has implemented the ATU (Temporary Authorization for Use) program to facil…
Apr 7th • 12 mins read
Melissa H. Roberts & Gary T. Ferguson
Real-World Evidence: Bridging Gaps in Evidence to Guide Payer Decisions
Real world evidence, RWE, payer decisions, RWD
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are preferred by payers for health technology assessments and coverage decisions, but they may not reflect real-world clinical practice. Real-world evidence (RWE) from observational studies can fill evidence gaps not addressed by RCTs and is valuable for payer …
Jun 18th • 6 mins read
Barbara Kiesewetter , Nathan I Cherny, Nicolas Boissel, Francesco Cerisoli, Urania Dafni, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Paolo Ghia, Nicola Gökbuget, Verónica González-Calle, Brian Huntly, Ulrich Jäger, Nicola Jane Latino, Jean-Yves Douillard, Luca Malcovati, Ma
EHA evaluation of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) for hematological malignancies
ESMO, hematological malignancies, Clinical benefit scale, EHA
The ESMO-MCBS v1.1 has not been previously validated for haematological malignancies, but it is being explored to avoid duplication of efforts. A feasibility test was conducted using 80 studies related to various haematological malignancies such as acute and chronic leukaemia, lymphoma, myel…
Jan 20th • 20 mins read
Kelvin Chan, Seungree Nam, Bill Evans, Claire de Oliveira Alexandra Chambers, Scott Gavura, Jeffrey Hoch, Rebecca E Mercer, Wei Fang Dai, Jaclyn Beca, Mina Tadrous, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
RWD, Canadian Real World Evidence, cancer drug, funding, framework
Oncology therapy is becoming more expensive, challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programs globally. Health technology assessment organizations use clinical trials for drug funding decisions, which may not reflect real-world outcomes. The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Valu…
Jan 7th • 8 mins read
Natansh D. Modi, BPharm; Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa, PhD; Ross A. McKinnon, PhD
Audit of Data Sharing by Pharmaceutical Companies for Anticancer Medicines Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
IPD sharing, clinical trial transparency, FDA anticancer approvals, oncology trials, data accessibility, pharmaceutical industry
The study examines the eligibility for individual participant data (IPD) sharing from clinical trials that supported the FDA approval of anticancer medicines over the past 10 years. Of the 304 trials analyzed, 136 (45%) were eligible for IPD sharing, while 168 (55%) were not. IPD sharing rates v…
Jul 28th • 20 mins read
Robbe Saesen, Georgios Kantidakis, Ann Marinus, Denis Lacombe, Isabelle Huys
How do cancer clinicians perceive real-world data and the evidence derived therefrom? Findings from an international survey of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
real-world evidence, real-world data, oncology, cancer, survey, clinicians, randomized controlled trials, Europe
Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly being used in the development and decision-making processes for anticancer therapies, but clinician views on its use are unclear. A survey conducted between May and July 2021 involved 557 clinicians from 30 countries and 13 cancer domains. Most clinician…
Aug 1st • 45 mins read
Envision Pharma Group
Patient involvement: A must-have in medicine development, but is it being overlooked in a cost-constrained environment?
patient engagement in pharma, patient-centric drug development, life sciences industry innovation, patient insights in medicine, regulatory compliance in patient engagement, patient involvement in clinical trials, benefits of patient advocacy, patient-cen
The life sciences industry is in a constant state of advancement, bringing more and more groundbreaking medicines, cutting-edge technologies, and innovative solutions to market. Amidst these rapid changes, patients remain at the heart of these scientific developments. In recent decades, the l…
May 9th • 5 mins read
Di Maria Jiang, Kelvin K. W. Chan, Raymond W. Jang, Christopher Booth, Geoffrey Liu, Eitan Amir, Robert Mason, Louis Everest, Elena Elimova
Anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for gastrointestinal malignancies: Clinical benefit and price considerations
ASCO VF, ESMO MCBS, gastrointestinal malignancies, anticancer drugs
Drugs approved between 2006 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical benefit was measured using ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale and ASCO Value Framework. 16 GI cancer drugs received FDA approval for 24 indications, including various drug classes such as monoclonal antibodies, oral targeted …
Mar 7th • 8 mins read