Results for 'adverse event'
Sean X Zhang, MSc , Dean Fergusson, PhD , Jonathan Kimmelman, PhD
Proportion of Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials Receiving Treatments That Are Ultimately Approved
cancer, biological markers, phase 1 clinical trials, drug approval, medical oncology, united states food and drug administration guidelines, adverse event, national comprehensive cancer network, American society of clinical oncology
Phase I oncology trials are often considered a therapeutic option, but this claim is primarily based on surrogate measures like objective response rates. A systematic search was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic value of phase I cancer trial participation, focusing on the likelihood of patien…
Apr 1st • 14 mins read
Meena N Murugappan, PharmD, MPH, PhD(c), Bellinda L King-Kallimanis, PhD, Gregory H Reaman, MD, Vishal Bhatnagar, MD, Erica G Horodniceanu, MPH, Najat Bouchkouj, MD, Paul G Kluetz, MD
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Registration Trials: A US Food and Drug Administration Perspective
cancer, pediatrics, product labeling, united states food and drug administration, childhood cancer, denosumab, surrogate endpoints, adverse event, patient self-report, pediatric oncology, selumetinib, benefit-risk assessment, tisagenlecleucel, statistica
PROs have been feasible to collect from patients as young as 7 years old and were included in trials from 2013 onward. PROs were used as exploratory endpoints in four product applications but not included in product labeling. To include PRO data in FDA labeling, early interaction with the FDA, c…
Apr 30th • 12 mins read
Laura A. Levit, Raymond P. Perez, David C. Smith, Richard L. Schilsky, Daniel F. Hayes, and Julie M. Vose
Streamlining Adverse Events Reporting in Oncology: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement
oncology, research, reporting, adverse events, clinical trials
Monitoring patient safety during clinical trials is crucial to protect research participants and future patients. Under current regulations for investigational new drugs (INDs), sponsors must report certain serious adverse events (AEs) to the FDA and all participating investigators quickly.…
Feb 20th • 3 mins read
Mateusz T. Wasylewski, Karolina Strzebonska, Magdalena Koperny, Maciej Polak, Jonathan Kimmelman, Marcin Waligora
Clinical development success rates and social value of pediatric Phase 1 trials in oncology
pediatric oncology, clinical development, trials, success rates
Pediatric Phase 1 trials in oncology aim to assess social value, focusing on rates of approval, transition to further phases, and citation in research. The study analyzed trials from 2004 to 2013, utilizing data from FDA, EMA, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and Google Scholar. …
Jun 21st • 28 mins read
Robbe Saesen, Georgios Kantidakis, Ann Marinus, Denis Lacombe, Isabelle Huys
How do cancer clinicians perceive real-world data and the evidence derived therefrom? Findings from an international survey of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
real-world evidence, real-world data, oncology, cancer, survey, clinicians, randomized controlled trials, Europe
Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly being used in the development and decision-making processes for anticancer therapies, but clinician views on its use are unclear. A survey conducted between May and July 2021 involved 557 clinicians from 30 countries and 13 cancer domains. Most clinician…
Aug 1st • 45 mins read
Fernando Petracci, Chirag Ghai, Andrew Pangilinan, Luis Alberto Suarez, Roberto Uehara, Marwan Ghosn
Use of real-world evidence for oncology clinical decision making in emerging economies
Asia-Pacific, effectiveness, electronic database, health policy, Latin America, Middle East, randomized clinical trials, real-world data, real-world evidence, safety
Despite RWE being a relatively nascent concept in emerging economies, we have seen evidence of increasing use over the past 5 years growing at 11% per year. That said, barriers specific to emerging economies need to be overcome through collaborative efforts, with regulatory agencies at the forefront…
May 5th • 12 mins read
Jason J. Yang, BS Naomi So, MD Nolan J. Maloney, MD Julia Arzeno, MD Katherine K. Clifton, MD Daniel Q. Bach, MD, MPH
Inadequate and delayed characterization of cutaneous reactions for US Food and Drug Administration-approved oncologic drugs from 2011-2020 leading to medication discontinuation
cutaneous, cutaneous reactions, FDA, oncologic drugs, AE, CenterWatch
Half of clinical trials lack detailed descriptions of rashes; over half discontinue therapy due to rash. There's a 1- to 2-year delay from identifying a rash to fully characterizing it, although this has improved over the last decade. Oncologic therapies are often discontinued without consulti…
Oct 23rd • 4 mins read
Emerson Y. Chen, MD, Vikram Raghunathan, MD, Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH
An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate
FDA, RR, drug approvels, OS
Many cancer drugs come to market based on single-arm studies with modest RRs. Most of these drugs are tested in studies of over 100 patients prior to approval. Most (60%) of these approvals lack randomized clinical trials during the life cycle of the product. Our findings suggest greater room for th…
May 28th • 5 mins read
Envision Pharma Group
AI-powered real-world evidence: Strategically enhancing value and access
Oncology, Clinical Development, Targeted Therapy, Immunotherapy, Genomic Profiling, CAR-T Cell Therapy, Precision Medicine
Real-world evidence (RWE) complements traditional randomized controlled trials by providing insights from diverse data sources, helping healthcare decision-makers with coverage, reimbursement, and treatment guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) are pivotal…
Aug 22nd • 5 mins read